Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Tecno Pova 4 Pro (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 24/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Tecno Pova 4 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 13 points higher (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 4 Pro leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 Pro (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 Pro (81/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 4 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Tecno Pova 4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 12, HIOS | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.8×77.0×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 Pro (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 Pro (81/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 4 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Tecno Pova 4 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova 4 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Tecno Pova 4 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Tecno Pova 4 Pro — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Tecno Pova 4 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Tecno Pova 4 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Pova 4 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.