Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs ZTE Blade V50
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the ZTE Blade V50 (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 32/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
ZTE Blade V50
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (35/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the ZTE Blade V50, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 5 points higher (37/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V50 leads (35/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (81/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (35/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (77/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | ZTE Blade V50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 33W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.9×72.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 178 g | |
| Price | — | $351 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Blade V50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V50
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (81/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (35/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (77/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the ZTE Blade V50 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the ZTE Blade V50?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the ZTE Blade V50 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the ZTE Blade V50?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The ZTE Blade V50 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.