Nokia 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Nokia 5 (2017) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 9/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP.
Nokia 5
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 28 points higher (37/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 5 leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 5 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 5 (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "design" category, the Nokia 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (98/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia 5 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 180440 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 827 | — | |
| Display | 5.2" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 5W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 7.1 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 149.7×72.5×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 152 g | — | |
| Price | $169 | — |
Nokia 5
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia 5
- 5.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1280x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 5
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 5 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 5 (81/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (98/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 5 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 5 by 28 points (37/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Nokia 5 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 5 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 5 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Nokia 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.