Samsung Galaxy S23+ vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy S23+ (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 68/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 1,695,011); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.6mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S23+

Performance 75
Display 79
Camera 67
Battery 50
Portability 66
Value for money 46

Vivo X Fold6

Performance 95
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 84

What makes Samsung Galaxy S23+ better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 68/100

What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 1695011
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S23+ vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 20 points higher (88/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S23+ — 46/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S23+ are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (82/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (100/100 vs 66/100).

Samsung Galaxy S23+: The Samsung Galaxy S23+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S23+ Vivo X Fold6
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1695011 3455738
Geekbench Single 2004 3293
Geekbench Multi 5311 10243
Display 6.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 45W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 133 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 13 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1750 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 157.8×76.2×7.6 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 196 g —
Launch price $999 $1900

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S23+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
67
camera

Vivo X Fold6

  • Main: 200MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S23+

  • 6.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X Fold6

  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S23+

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Vivo X Fold6

  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S23+ and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
68/100
1695011 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +51.0%
3455738 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy S23+ by 51.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S23+

$999

Vivo X Fold6

$1900

Launch price difference: $901. Samsung Galaxy S23+ was $901 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (95/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S23+ are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (87/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (82/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ (100/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S23+ or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23+ by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S23+ and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy S23+ has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S23+ or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S23+ or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S23+ over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy S23+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.