Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S22 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2200, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $799 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 56/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3700); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 1,434,169); the Samsung Galaxy S22 is noticeably lighter (168g vs 192g).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 by 34 points (90/100 vs 56/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S22

Performance 68
Display 82
Camera 39
Battery 24
Portability 83
Value for money 26

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S22 better?

  • Lighter: 168g vs 192g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $970

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 1434169
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1588
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 3958
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S22 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 34 points higher (90/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S22 — 26/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (87/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (81/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (83/100 vs 63/100).

Samsung Galaxy S22: The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S22 Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2200 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 1434169 5016623
Geekbench Single 1588 4188
Geekbench Multi 3958 13145
Display 6.1" AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1216x2660
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 64 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 146.0×70.6×7.6 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 168 g 192 g
Launch price $799 $970

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S22

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
39
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S22

  • 6.1" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S22

  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S22 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200
56/100
1434169 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +71.4%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S22 by 71.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S22

$799

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $171. Samsung Galaxy S22 was $171 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (100/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (87/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (81/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (83/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S22 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 by 34 points (90/100 vs 56/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S22 and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S22 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S22 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.