Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M35 leads — 32/100 vs 31/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is noticeably lighter (203g vs 222g).
Samsung Galaxy M35
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Better camera (29/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 25W
- Lighter: 203g vs 222g
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (46/100 vs 22/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M35 vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Samsung Galaxy M35 scores 1 points higher (32/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (46/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (93/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 768212 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2758 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | 203 g | |
| Price | $249 | — |
Samsung Galaxy M35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (46/100 vs 22/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (93/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 edges out the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.