Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (2022) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) leads — 23/100 vs 11/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) scores 12 points higher (23/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 850 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×76.9×8.4 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (76/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.