Samsung Galaxy M01s vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy M01s (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 21/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 177,554).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M01s
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy M01s better?
- Lighter: 168g vs 179g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M01s vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 7 points higher (28/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M01s (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M01s is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M01s | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.2" PLS TFT | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1520 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), One UI Core 1.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 156.9×75.8×7.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 168 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M01s
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M01s
- 6.2" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M01s
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M01s and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Samsung Galaxy M01s by 41.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M01s (52/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M01s is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M01s or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy M01s by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M01s and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M01s has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M01s or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M01s over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 32/100).