Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 410, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $220 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 16/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 3100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 is noticeably lighter (159g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 better?
- Lighter: 159g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $280
- Better portability (82/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 99
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 319
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 3100 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 55 points higher (71/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (88/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (73/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (82/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 99 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 319 | 8430 | |
| Display | 5.2" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 145.8×72.3×8.1 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 159 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $220 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
- 5.2" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
- 3100 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $60. Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 was $60 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (88/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (94/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (35/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (73/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (82/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 by 55 points (71/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on camera score (35/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.