Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 8/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4380); the Samsung Galaxy Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 263g).
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Vivo Y32t
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (5/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4380 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 263g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 21/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Fold vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 3 points higher (11/100 vs 8/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Fold is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (36/100 vs 21/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Fold | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 824513 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 968 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2731 | — | |
| Display | 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1536x2152 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | — | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 160.9×62.9×15.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 263 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- Main: —
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED
- Resolution: 1536x2152
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 4380 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Fold is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (36/100 vs 21/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (76/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy Fold by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a MobileRank rating of 8/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Fold leads on camera score (5/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Fold over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.