Samsung Galaxy F17 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy F17 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1330, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy F17 leads — 24/100 vs 11/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy F17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy F17
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F17 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy F17 scores 13 points higher (24/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F17 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy F17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy F17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy F17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (76/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F17 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F17 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F17 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F17 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F17 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F17 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F17 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.