Samsung Galaxy F04 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy F04 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 25/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 199,111).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F04
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy F04 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 476 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 828 vs 779
- Overall rating 25/100
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 199111
- Lighter: 179g vs 188g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 19/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F04 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 3 points higher (28/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Samsung Galaxy F04 are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F04 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F04
- 6.5" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F04
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F04 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Samsung Galaxy F04 by 34.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Samsung Galaxy F04 are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F04 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy F04 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F04 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F04 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F04 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 55/100).