Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A72 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A72 leads — 26/100 vs 11/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A72 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 203g).
Samsung Galaxy A72
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (79/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A72 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A72 scores 15 points higher (26/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 leads (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (76/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (79/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 514398 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×77.4×8.4 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $450 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Main: 64MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A72
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A72
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (36/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (76/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (79/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A72 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 leads on camera score (36/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.