Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A71 (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 730, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads — 22/100 vs 11/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A71 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A71
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (77/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A71 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A71 scores 11 points higher (22/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads (77/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 76/100. In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (77/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A71 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 730 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 496392 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 724 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×76.0×7.7 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $470 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (43/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 76/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (77/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A71 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A71 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A71 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A71 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.