Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7880, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 8/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 16 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 16MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (5/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (78/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3600 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 186g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 1/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 67/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 3 points higher (11/100 vs 8/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 1/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 leads (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (36/100 vs 1/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 67/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (78/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7880 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 95000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 175 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 760 | — | |
| Display | 5.7" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 6.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 156.8×77.6×7.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $459 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
- Main: 16MP f/1.9
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
- 5.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1920x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
- 3600 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (36/100 vs 1/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 67/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (78/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 8/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 leads on camera score (5/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.