Samsung Galaxy A57 vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A57 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1680, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $350 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 57/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 1,390,055); the Samsung Galaxy A57 is thinner (6.9mm vs 8.1mm).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 by 33 points (90/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A57

Performance 68
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 44
Portability 80
Value for money 48

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy A57 better?

  • Lighter: 183g vs 192g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $970

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 1390055
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1382
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 4477
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A57 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 33 points higher (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A57 — 48/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A57 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (80/100 vs 63/100).

Samsung Galaxy A57: The Samsung Galaxy A57 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A57 Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 1680 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 1390055 5016623
Geekbench Single 1382 4188
Geekbench Multi 4477 13145
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1216x2660
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 161.5×76.8×6.9 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 183 g 192 g
Launch price $350 $970

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A57

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A57

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A57

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A57 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680
57/100
1390055 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +72.3%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A57 by 72.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A57

$350

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $620. Samsung Galaxy A57 was $620 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (100/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (87/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (81/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A57 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (80/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A57 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 by 33 points (90/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A57 and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A57 has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A57 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A57 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A57 over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A57 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.