Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A56 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1580, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $499 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 61/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 1,251,512).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 by 29 points (90/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A56

Performance 65
Display 79
Camera 53
Battery 48
Portability 67
Value for money 44

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy A56 better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $970

  • Better portability (67/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 1251512
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1353
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 3832
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 192g vs 198g

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 53/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A56 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 29 points higher (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A56 — 44/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (100/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (87/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A56 and the Vivo X500 Pro are nearly equal (67/100 vs 63/100).

Samsung Galaxy A56: The Samsung Galaxy A56 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A56 Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Exynos 1580 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 1251512 5016623
Geekbench Single 1353 4188
Geekbench Multi 3832 13145
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1216x2660
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 114 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 162.2×77.5×7.4 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 198 g 192 g
Launch price $499 $970

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A56

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
53
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A56

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A56

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A56 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A56 Exynos 1580
61/100
1251512 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +75.1%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A56 by 75.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A56

$499

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $471. Samsung Galaxy A56 was $471 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (100/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (87/100 vs 53/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 (81/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A56 and the Vivo X500 Pro are nearly equal (67/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A56 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A56 by 29 points (90/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A56 and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A56 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A56 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 53/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A56 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A56 over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A56 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.