Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A34 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1080, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A34 leads — 33/100 vs 11/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Samsung Galaxy A34
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A34 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A34 scores 22 points higher (33/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A34 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 729766 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1032 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2507 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $400 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A34
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A34
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (36/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (76/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 22 points (33/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A34 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 leads on camera score (36/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A34 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.