Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
The Samsung Galaxy A34 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1080, while the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A34 leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP.
Samsung Galaxy A34
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Better camera (36/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A34 vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India), the Samsung Galaxy A34 scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is a bit better (36/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A34 | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 729766 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1032 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2507 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 188 g | |
| Price | $400 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A34
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A34
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is a bit better (36/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 edges out the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A34 and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 leads on camera score (36/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A34 over the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.