Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (2026) runs on the Exynos 1480, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $299 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 54/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 903,337); the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G is noticeably lighter (185g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Samsung Galaxy A27 5G better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 212g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 903337
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1137
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 3437
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $299
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 17 points higher (71/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A27 5G — 46/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (88/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G are nearly equal (35/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (74/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1480 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 903337 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1137 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3437 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $299 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Samsung Galaxy A27 5G by 67.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $19. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ was $19 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (88/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G are nearly equal (35/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (73/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (74/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 5G has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.