Samsung Galaxy A26 vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $250 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 65/100 vs 50/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,673,316 vs 754,064); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is thinner (7.7mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A26
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 209g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $300
- Better portability (63/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1673316 vs 754064
- Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 2710
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A26 vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 15 points higher (65/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (72/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (63/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A26 | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 754064 | 1673316 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2710 | 4313 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 15 / HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A26 and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 54.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $50. Samsung Galaxy A26 was $50 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (69/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (72/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (63/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A26 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A26 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on camera score (43/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on performance (69/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A26 over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.