Samsung Galaxy A24 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Samsung Galaxy A24 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $229 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 47/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 554,590); the Samsung Galaxy A24 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A24
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Samsung Galaxy A24 better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $280
- Better portability (64/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 554590
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A24 vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 24 points higher (71/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A24 — 48/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (88/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Samsung Galaxy A24 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A24 | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 554590 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $229 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A24
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A24
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A24
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A24 and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Samsung Galaxy A24 by 80.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $51. Samsung Galaxy A24 was $51 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (88/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (94/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Samsung Galaxy A24 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (73/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 by 24 points (71/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A24 and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.