Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo iQOO Z11x

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO Z11x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo; estimated prices are $182 and $170. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z11x leads — 37/100 vs 25/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11x has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z11x is faster in AnTuTu (1,214,772 vs 503,850); the Samsung Galaxy A16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z11x doesn't.

The Vivo iQOO Z11x is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 24
Battery 37
Design 50
Value for money 97
Vivo iQOO Z11x
Performance 8
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 51
Design 62
Value for money 98
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?

  • Overall rating 25/100
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11x better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1214772 vs 503850
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 760
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1890
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 190g vs 200g
  • Cheaper: $170 vs $182

  • Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better value for money (98/100 vs 97/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo iQOO Z11x, the Vivo iQOO Z11x scores 12 points higher (37/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (62/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (98/100 vs 97/100).

Samsung Galaxy A16: The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO Z11x: The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 Vivo iQOO Z11x
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
AnTuTu 503850 1214772
Geekbench Single 760 1061
Geekbench Multi 1890 3185
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 2400x1080
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 25W 44W
DXOMark (camera) 77
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 8 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm
Weight 200 g 190 g
Price $182 $170
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
24
camera
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 and Vivo iQOO Z11x, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A16 MediaTek Helio G99
25/100
503850 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z11x MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
37/100 +58.5%
1214772 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Z11x leads Samsung Galaxy A16 by 58.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A16
$182
Vivo iQOO Z11x
$170

Price difference: $12. Vivo iQOO Z11x is cheaper by $12.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (62/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (98/100 vs 97/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?

The Vivo iQOO Z11x is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo iQOO Z11x?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11x — 37/100.

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?

The Vivo iQOO Z11x leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo iQOO Z11x?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.