Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $199 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads — 65/100 vs 44/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,052,566 vs 607,489).

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 21 points (65/100 vs 44/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

Performance 48
Display 67
Camera 24
Battery 44
Portability 60
Value for money 50

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

Performance 76
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 71
Portability 51
Value for money 80

What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 5G better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 212g
  • Cheaper at launch: $199 vs $250

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2052566 vs 607489
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 992
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 2197
  • Bigger battery: 7620 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (76/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better camera (32/100 vs 24/100)
  • Longer battery life (71/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo scores 21 points higher (65/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A16 5G — 50/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (71/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
Processor Samsung Exynos 1330 MediaTek Dimensity 8400
AnTuTu 607489 2052566
Geekbench Single 992 1579
Geekbench Multi 2197 6100
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7620 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
DXOMark (camera) 77 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 4400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP65
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm
Weight 200 g 212 g
Launch price $199 $250

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
24
camera

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 7620 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
44/100
607489 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 8400
65/100 +70.4%
2052566 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 70.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

$199

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

$250

Launch price difference: $51. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G was $51 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (76/100 vs 48/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (94/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (71/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 21 points (65/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads on camera score (32/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads on performance (76/100 vs 48/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.