Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $199 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads — 65/100 vs 44/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,052,566 vs 607,489).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 5G better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $199 vs $250
- Better portability (60/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2052566 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 992
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 2197
- Bigger battery: 7620 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo scores 21 points higher (65/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A16 5G — 50/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (71/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 2052566 | |
| Geekbench Single | 992 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2197 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7620 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 77 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $199 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- 7620 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 70.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $51. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G was $51 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (76/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (94/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (71/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 21 points (65/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads on camera score (32/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads on performance (76/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.