Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy A13 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 850, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $200 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 30/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 234,339); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.8mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 by 58 points (88/100 vs 30/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A13
Performance 16
Display 42
Camera 32
Battery 43
Portability 53
Value for money 22
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A13 better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 30/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 234339
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 836
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A13 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 58 points higher (88/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A13 — 22/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (81/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (82/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (100/100 vs 53/100).

Samsung Galaxy A13: The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A13 Vivo X Fold6
Processor Samsung Exynos 850 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 234339 3485039
Geekbench Single 300 3228
Geekbench Multi 836 9553
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2408 2480x2200
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 15W 80W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 20 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB / 6GB 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB / 128GB 512GB
OS Android 12, One UI 4.1 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 165.1×76.4×8.8 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 195 g
Launch price $200 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A13
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 8MP
32
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A13
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
42
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A13
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A13 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A13 Samsung Exynos 850
30/100
234339 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +93.3%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy A13 by 93.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A13
$200
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Launch price difference: $1700. Samsung Galaxy A13 was $1700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (94/100 vs 16/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (81/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (87/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (82/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 (100/100 vs 53/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A13 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 by 58 points (88/100 vs 30/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A13 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A13 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A13 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 16/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A13 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.