Samsung Galaxy A08 4G vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $175 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 42/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 554,590); the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G doesn't; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.0mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G by 46 points (88/100 vs 42/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A08 4G

Performance 43
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 61
Value for money 52

Vivo X Fold6

Performance 95
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 84

What makes Samsung Galaxy A08 4G better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $175 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 42/100

What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 554590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 46 points higher (88/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A08 4G — 52/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (82/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (100/100 vs 61/100).

Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A08 4G Vivo X Fold6
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 554590 3455738
Geekbench Single 727 3293
Geekbench Multi 2047 10243
Display 6.7" PLS LCD 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 2480x2200
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 20 MP
RAM 4GB 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB / 256GB 512GB
OS Android 17 Android 15
Brightness (peak) — 5500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 167.4×77.4×8.0 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 197 g —
Launch price $175 $1900

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A08 4G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X Fold6

  • Main: 200MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A08 4G

  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Vivo X Fold6

  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A08 4G

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Vivo X Fold6

  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A08 4G and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A08 4G MediaTek Helio G99
42/100
554590 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +84.0%
3455738 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy A08 4G by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A08 4G

$175

Vivo X Fold6

$1900

Launch price difference: $1725. Samsung Galaxy A08 4G was $1725 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (95/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (81/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (87/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (82/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G (100/100 vs 61/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G by 46 points (88/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A08 4G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A08 4G over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.