Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 24/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 8 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 153,667); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 196g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 846 vs 779
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 205
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 196g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 9/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 4 points higher (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 9/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $100 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 49.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 50/100).