Redmi Turbo 5 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 67/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 1,290,942).
Redmi Turbo 5
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (80/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 1553
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 4 points higher (71/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (74/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $250 | — |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 117.6% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (86/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (74/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (80/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.