Redmi K90 Max vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Redmi K90 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Max leads — 74/100 vs 71/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Max has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Redmi K90 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,803,420 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 227g).

The Redmi K90 Max edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K90 Max
Performance 95
Display 94
Camera 37
Battery 78
Portability 41
Value for money 74
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Redmi K90 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3803420 vs 1290942
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4453
  • Bigger battery: 8550 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 69/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 204g vs 227g

  • Better camera (86/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Max vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Redmi K90 Max scores 3 points higher (74/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (95/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (95/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Max is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).

Redmi K90 Max: The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K90 Max ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3803420 1290942
Geekbench Single 3228 1675
Geekbench Multi 9553 4453
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1280 1116x2480
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8550 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 20 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP66
Dimensions 162.9×77.9×8.1 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 227 g 204 g
Price $504
Camera comparison
Redmi K90 Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K90 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K90 Max
  • 8550 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
78
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Max and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500
74/100
3803420 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 -194.6%
1290942 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Max leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 194.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi K90 Max
$504
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (95/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Max is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (86/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (78/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K90 Max or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Redmi K90 Max edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Max and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Redmi K90 Max has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Max or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Max or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Redmi K90 Max leads on performance (95/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Max over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.