Redmi Turbo 5 vs ZTE Axon 40

The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 66/100 vs 58/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,112,047 vs 1,010,069).

The Redmi Turbo 5 edges out the ZTE Axon 40 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Turbo 5

Performance 77
Display 85
Camera 37
Battery 74
Portability 55
Value for money 82

ZTE Axon 40

Performance 61
Display 73
Camera 51
Battery 52
Portability 53
Value for money —

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2112047 vs 1010069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1298
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 3520
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 53/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 200g vs 204g

  • Better camera (51/100 vs 37/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 8 points higher (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (77/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (77/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).

Redmi Turbo 5: The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 40: The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Turbo 5 ZTE Axon 40
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
AnTuTu 2112047 1010069
Geekbench Single 1555 1298
Geekbench Multi 6405 3520
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.7"
Resolution 2756x1268 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W —
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 20 MP 44 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB —
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 12 Snow Cone
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 204 g 200 g
Launch price $250 —

Camera comparison

Redmi Turbo 5

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

ZTE Axon 40

  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 44MP
51
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Turbo 5

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2756x1268
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

ZTE Axon 40

  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
73
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Turbo 5

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery

ZTE Axon 40

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Turbo 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
66/100
2112047 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
58/100 -109.1%
1010069 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 leads ZTE Axon 40 by 109.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Turbo 5

$250

ZTE Axon 40

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (77/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (74/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Redmi Turbo 5 edges out the ZTE Axon 40 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Axon 40?

The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Axon 40?

The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (77/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the ZTE Axon 40?

The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.