Redmi Turbo 5 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $250 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 66/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6800); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,112,047); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Turbo 5

Performance 77
Display 85
Camera 37
Battery 74
Portability 55
Value for money 82

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?

  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Lighter: 204g vs 224g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $892

  • Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2112047
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 74/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 21 points higher (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).

Redmi Turbo 5: The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Turbo 5 Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2112047 3950082
Geekbench Single 1555 3639
Geekbench Multi 6405 11047
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2756x1268 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 20 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 204 g 224 g
Launch price $250 $892

Camera comparison

Redmi Turbo 5

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Turbo 5

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2756x1268
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Turbo 5

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Turbo 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
66/100
2112047 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +46.5%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 46.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Turbo 5

$250

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Launch price difference: $642. Redmi Turbo 5 was $642 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (98/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (87/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 74/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.