Redmi Turbo 5 vs Vivo S16e
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Vivo S16e (2022) runs on the Exynos 1080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 67/100 vs 49/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4600); the Vivo S16e is noticeably lighter (187g vs 204g).
Redmi Turbo 5
Vivo S16e
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better camera (37/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Lighter: 187g vs 204g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Vivo S16e, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 18 points higher (67/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (37/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (74/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (70/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Vivo S16e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Exynos 1080 | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 187 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | — |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16e
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (37/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (74/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (70/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo S16e?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the Vivo S16e — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo S16e?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo S16e — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo S16e?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Vivo S16e?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use.