Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Vivo X200 Pro Mini
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400; launch prices were $300 and $750. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads — 82/100 vs 71/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5700); the Vivo X200 Pro Mini is faster in AnTuTu (2,779,129 vs 2,726,802); the Vivo X200 Pro Mini is noticeably lighter (189g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 8767
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $750
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 75/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Pro Mini better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2779129 vs 2726802
- Better Geekbench Single: 2797 vs 2725
- Lighter: 189g vs 219g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (87/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 45/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Vivo X200 Pro Mini, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini scores 11 points higher (82/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads (78/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (63/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | |
| AnTuTu | 2726802 | 2779129 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2797 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 8767 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $750 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 5700 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:58 hrs, total 28:40 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Vivo X200 Pro Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 1.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $450. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (78/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (63/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.