Redmi K90 Max vs Vivo X200 Pro Mini

The Redmi K90 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400; estimated prices are $504 and $750. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads — 68/100 vs 67/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Max has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 5700); the Redmi K90 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,803,420 vs 2,770,807); the Vivo X200 Pro Mini is noticeably lighter (189g vs 227g).

The Vivo X200 Pro Mini edges out the Redmi K90 Max by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K90 Max
Performance 82
Display 100
Camera 32
Battery 77
Design 16
Value for money 75
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Performance 61
Display 100
Camera 74
Battery 61
Design 63
Value for money 58
What makes Redmi K90 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3803420 vs 2770807
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2797
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 8767
  • Bigger battery: 8550 vs 5700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $504 vs $750

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better value for money (75/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Pro Mini better?
  • Lighter: 189g vs 227g

  • Better camera (74/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 16/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Max vs the Vivo X200 Pro Mini, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini scores 1 points higher (68/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (82/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads (74/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (77/100 vs 61/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (75/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (82/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (74/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (77/100 vs 61/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (63/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (75/100 vs 58/100).

Redmi K90 Max: The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X200 Pro Mini: The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K90 Max Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu 3803420 2770807
Geekbench Single 3228 2797
Geekbench Multi 9553 8767
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1280 2800x1260
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8550 mAh 5700 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP66 IP68
Dimensions 162.9×77.9×8.1 mm 150.8×71.8×8.2 mm
Weight 227 g 189 g
Price $504 $750
Camera comparison
Redmi K90 Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
32
camera
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
  • Main: 50MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K90 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
  • 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K90 Max
  • 8550 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
77
battery
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
  • 5700 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:58 hrs, total 28:40 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
61
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Max and Vivo X200 Pro Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500
67/100
3803420 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Pro Mini MediaTek Dimensity 9400
68/100 -37.3%
2770807 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Max leads Vivo X200 Pro Mini by 37.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi K90 Max
$504
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
$750

Price difference: $246. Redmi K90 Max is cheaper by $246.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (82/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (74/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (77/100 vs 61/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (63/100 vs 16/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (75/100 vs 58/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K90 Max or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?

The Vivo X200 Pro Mini edges out the Redmi K90 Max by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Max and the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?

The Redmi K90 Max has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 68/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Max or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?

The Vivo X200 Pro Mini leads on camera score (74/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Max or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?

The Redmi K90 Max leads on performance (82/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Max over the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?

The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a better fit for active users.