Redmi Note 17 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 17 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $230 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 809,091).
Redmi Note 17 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 7000 mAh
- Lighter: 226g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $950
- Overall rating 55/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 809091
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1009
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2892
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 73/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 73/100). Value score: Redmi Note 17 Pro — 66/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 17 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 809091 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1009 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2892 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $950 |
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 17 Pro by 81.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $720. Redmi Note 17 Pro was $720 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 17 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.