Redmi Note 17 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi Note 17 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $230 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 56/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 876,983).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 17 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Redmi Note 17 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 6510 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $899
- Overall rating 56/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 876983
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1009
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2892
- Faster charging: 90W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 32 points higher (88/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Redmi Note 17 Pro — 66/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 876983 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1009 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2892 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Redmi Note 17 Pro by 73.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $669. Redmi Note 17 Pro was $669 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 73/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro by 32 points (88/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.