Redmi Note 17 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Redmi Note 17 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $230 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 55/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 809,091); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 226g).
Redmi Note 17 Pro
Vivo iQOO 13
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 6150 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $650
- Overall rating 55/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 809091
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1009
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2892
- Faster charging: 120W vs 67W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 226g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 29 points higher (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Redmi Note 17 Pro — 66/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (78/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 73/100. In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (55/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 809091 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1009 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2892 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.5 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $650 |
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Redmi Note 17 Pro by 74.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $420. Redmi Note 17 Pro was $420 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (92/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (78/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 73/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (55/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro by 29 points (84/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.