Redmi Note 17 4G vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi Note 17 4G (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $165 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 46/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 4G has the bigger battery (7700 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 505,682).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 17 4G
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Redmi Note 17 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 7700 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 224g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $165 vs $899
- Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 505682
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 484
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1558
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 36/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 4G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 42 points higher (88/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Redmi Note 17 4G — 62/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (94/100 vs 36/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Redmi Note 17 4G are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 4G | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 505682 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 484 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1558 | 10243 | |
| Display | 7.0" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2396 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 169.7×79.1×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 224 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $165 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 17 4G
- 7.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2396
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 17 4G
- 7700 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 17 4G and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Redmi Note 17 4G by 84.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $734. Redmi Note 17 4G was $734 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (94/100 vs 36/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Redmi Note 17 4G are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G by 42 points (88/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 4G and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 17 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 36/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 4G over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.