Redmi Note 17 4G vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Redmi Note 17 4G (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $165 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 46/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 4G has the bigger battery (7700 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 505,682); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 17 4G
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Redmi Note 17 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 7700 vs 6150 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $165 vs $650
- Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 505682
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 484
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1558
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 224g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 36/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 4G vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 38 points higher (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Redmi Note 17 4G — 62/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (55/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 4G | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 505682 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 484 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1558 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.0" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2396 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7700 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 169.7×79.1×8.5 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 224 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $165 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 17 4G
- 7.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2396
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 17 4G
- 7700 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 17 4G and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Redmi Note 17 4G by 83.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $485. Redmi Note 17 4G was $485 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (91/100 vs 36/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (99/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (78/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (55/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 4G or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G by 38 points (84/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 4G and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 17 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 4G or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 4G or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 36/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 4G over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.