Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 54/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (211g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) better?
- Lighter: 211g vs 230g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2939
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 37 points higher (91/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1050 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2939 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 211 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.