Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $259 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 54/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $259 vs $950
- Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 53/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 69/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 37 points higher (91/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (96/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.3×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $259 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $691. Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G was $691 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (99/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (96/100 vs 53/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G (85/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 53/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.