Redmi Note 14 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Redmi Note 14 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $299 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 54/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 804,731); the Redmi Note 14 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 14 Pro

Performance 54
Display 83
Camera 35
Battery 54
Portability 63
Value for money 46

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Redmi Note 14 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $950

  • Better portability (63/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 804731
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 14 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 37 points higher (91/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Redmi Note 14 Pro — 46/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro (85/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 14 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 804731 4247433
Geekbench Single 1011 3639
Geekbench Multi 2813 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2712x1220 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.3×74.4×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 190 g 230 g
Launch price $299 $950

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 14 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 14 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 14 Pro

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 14 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 14 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
54/100
804731 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +81.1%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 14 Pro by 81.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 14 Pro

$299

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $651. Redmi Note 14 Pro was $651 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro (96/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro (85/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 14 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.