Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $293 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 59/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,015,859); the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (205g vs 225g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Performance 57
Display 83
Camera 48
Battery 64
Portability 46
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

What makes Redmi Note 13 Pro+ better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 205g vs 225g
  • Cheaper at launch: $293 vs $548

  • Better camera (48/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (46/100 vs 38/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1015859
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1119
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2690
  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 16 points higher (75/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ leads (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ — 58/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (95/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (46/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
AnTuTu 1015859 3579952
Geekbench Single 1119 3293
Geekbench Multi 2690 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
Resolution 2712x1220 1440x3200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 9100 mAh
Charging 120W 100W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 13 / MIUI 14 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 161.4×74.2×8.9 mm 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 205 g 225 g
Launch price $293 $548

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
48
camera

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
59/100
1015859 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100 +71.6%
3579952 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 Pro+ by 71.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

$293

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Launch price difference: $255. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ was $255 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (95/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (80/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (46/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ leads on camera score (48/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.