Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 50/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G by 41 points (91/100 vs 50/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Performance 38
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 53
Portability 67
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better?
  • Lighter: 188g vs 230g

  • Better portability (67/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 760
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1890
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 41 points higher (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (99/100 vs 38/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (67/100 vs 39/100).

Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 4247433
Geekbench Single 760 3640
Geekbench Multi 1890 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 67W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP69
Dimensions 161.1×75.0×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 188 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
48
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (99/100 vs 38/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (96/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (85/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (67/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G by 41 points (91/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 38/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.