Redmi Note 13 4G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $146 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 66/100 vs 36/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,800,202 vs 469,734); the Redmi Note 13 4G is noticeably lighter (188g vs 218g).
Redmi Note 13 4G
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Lighter: 188g vs 218g
- Cheaper: $146 vs $1299
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2800202 vs 469734
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 1396
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 30 points higher (66/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G leads (100/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (81/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (65/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 469734 | 2800202 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 218 g | |
| Price | $146 | $1299 |
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Redmi Note 13 4G and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 4G by 83.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1153. Redmi Note 13 4G is cheaper by $1153.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (81/100 vs 41/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (65/100 vs 27/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G by 30 points (66/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 41/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.