Redmi Note 11 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Redmi Note 11 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G96, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $299 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 493,222); the Redmi Note 11 Pro is noticeably lighter (202g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 11 Pro
Performance 41
Display 79
Camera 44
Battery 62
Portability 57
Value for money 44
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Redmi Note 11 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 202g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $950

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 493222
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 678
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1895
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 44/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 11 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Redmi Note 11 Pro — 44/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro (85/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 11 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Redmi Note 11 Pro: The Redmi Note 11 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 11 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G96 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 493222 4247433
Geekbench Single 678 3640
Geekbench Multi 1895 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2400x1080 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 67W 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 108 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 16
NFC yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 202 g 230 g
Launch price $299 $950
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 11 Pro
  • Main: 108MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
44
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 11 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 11 Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • Wireless charging: no data
62
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 11 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 11 Pro MediaTek Helio G96
51/100
493222 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +88.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 11 Pro by 88.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 11 Pro
$299
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $651. Redmi Note 11 Pro was $651 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro (99/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro (96/100 vs 44/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro (85/100 vs 62/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 11 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 11 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 11 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 11 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 11 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 44/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 11 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 11 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 11 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.