Redmi Note 10 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 49/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 531,656); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max doesn't; the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 10 Pro Max better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 230g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 531656
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 752
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1819
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5020 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 42/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 42 points higher (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 10 Pro Max | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 531656 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 752 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1819 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×76.2×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- 5020 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 10 Pro Max and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 10 Pro Max by 87.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (99/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (96/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max by 42 points (91/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 42/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.