Redmi 4A vs ZTE Voyage 30 Pro
The Redmi 4A (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, while the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 810 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro leads — 23/100 vs 10/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3120); the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP; the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 4A doesn't; the Redmi 4A is noticeably lighter (131g vs 215g).
Redmi 4A
ZTE Voyage 30 Pro
- Lighter: 131g vs 215g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 31/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3120 mAh
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (23/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Redmi 4A vs the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro scores 13 points higher (23/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro leads (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro leads (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4A leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi 4A (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro (100/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi 4A | ZTE Voyage 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 | MediaTek Dimensity 810 () | |
| AnTuTu | 180934 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 130 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 488 | — | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.7" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 3120 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 16GB / 32GB | 128GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 139.9×70.4×8.5 mm | 165.8×77.5×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 131 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $100 | — |
Redmi 4A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Voyage 30 Pro
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi 4A
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Voyage 30 Pro
- 6.7" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Redmi 4A
- 3120 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Voyage 30 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Voyage 30 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi 4A (23/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (45/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro (100/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 4A or the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro?
The ZTE Voyage 30 Pro is noticeably better than the Redmi 4A — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi 4A and the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro?
The Redmi 4A has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro — 23/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 4A or the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro?
The ZTE Voyage 30 Pro leads on camera score (23/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 4A over the ZTE Voyage 30 Pro?
The Redmi 4A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Voyage 30 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.