Nokia G100 vs Redmi 4A
The Nokia G100 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Redmi 4A (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425; estimated prices are $79 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G100 leads — 14/100 vs 10/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G100 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3120); the Nokia G100 is faster in AnTuTu (320,666 vs 180,934); the Redmi 4A is noticeably lighter (131g vs 195g).
Nokia G100
Redmi 4A
- Higher AnTuTu: 320666 vs 180934
- Better Geekbench Single: 345 vs 130
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1065 vs 488
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3120 mAh
- Cheaper: $79 vs $100
- Better camera (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 131g vs 195g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Nokia G100 vs the Redmi 4A, the Nokia G100 scores 4 points higher (14/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia G100 leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia G100 and the Redmi 4A are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia G100 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (100/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Nokia G100 | Redmi 4A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 180934 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 130 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 488 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3120 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 128GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.6×76.7×8.9 mm | 139.9×70.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 131 g | |
| Price | $79 | $100 |
Nokia G100
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi 4A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia G100
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi 4A
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia G100
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Redmi 4A
- 3120 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G100 and Redmi 4A, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G100 leads Redmi 4A by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $21. Nokia G100 is cheaper by $21.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G100 and the Redmi 4A are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia G100 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (100/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Nokia G100 or the Redmi 4A?
The Nokia G100 edges out the Redmi 4A by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G100 and the Redmi 4A?
The Nokia G100 has a MobileRank rating of 14/100, the Redmi 4A — 10/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G100 over the Redmi 4A?
The Nokia G100 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi 4A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.