Redmi 4A vs ZTE Blade V80 Pro
The Redmi 4A (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, while the ZTE Blade V80 Pro (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7280. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads — 32/100 vs 10/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade V80 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3120); the main camera is 13 MP vs 108 MP; the Redmi 4A is noticeably lighter (131g vs 195g).
Redmi 4A
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- Lighter: 131g vs 195g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 56/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3120 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (38/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Redmi 4A vs the ZTE Blade V80 Pro, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro scores 22 points higher (32/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads (38/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4A leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (38/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Pro (100/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi 4A | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 | Unisoc T7280 | |
| AnTuTu | 180934 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 130 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 488 | — | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | — | 900x1940 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3120 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 16GB / 32GB | 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 139.9×70.4×8.5 mm | 166.0×79.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 131 g | 195 g | |
| Price | $100 | — |
Redmi 4A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Redmi 4A
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 4A
- 3120 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (38/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Pro (100/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 4A or the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The ZTE Blade V80 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A by 22 points (32/100 vs 10/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi 4A and the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The Redmi 4A has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 4A or the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads on camera score (38/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 4A over the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The Redmi 4A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V80 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.